spannerisms

I have an issue that probably falls within the scope of this one, so I'll just bring it up here instead of a new issue. Various SPC700 operations seem to...

Thanks for the offer, but I'm mainly an on-my-own kinda person when it comes to most hacking.

I think following the decades old convention is more important in this case. Can it not be conditional based on version, such that older code uses the backwards syntax? If...

> I haven't heard of this decades old convention until now, so I must disagree about its importance. It's only in every documentation of the chip you can find anywhere,...

I'm worried it would interfere with my address labels if the underscore were used. Would `+Label:` be a viable solution? Stackable "pools" (whatever they end up being called) is something...

Sorry, I got confused! I thought you were proposing `_` at the start of the label be used to create the phantom label. I'm not particularly attached to the word...

That's awesome! Thanks.

Would it be possible to make `#Label` type labels not generate an error? I can see potential for use cases where someone might want a generic top-level label used within...

That's how I currently plan on refactoring, but it still kinda sucks. Anything that makes SPC stuff easier is good, so I figured it doesn't hurt to bring it up.