sv-benchmarks icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
sv-benchmarks copied to clipboard

Collection of Verification Tasks (MOVED, please follow the link)

Results 80 sv-benchmarks issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

Hi all, I'm running some tests now and just saw the distribution for the SoftwareSystems category: Systems_BusyBox_MemSafety: 52 benchmarks Systems_BusyBox_Overflows: 52 benchmarks Systems_DeviceDriversLinux64_ReachSafety: 2796 benchmarks Given our meta category score...

category definitions

Hi, in those benchmarks there are calls to functions (or dereference of an external variable in one case) that are not defined and then a decision is made based on...

issue with benchmark

Hi, I was just going through this `ntdrivers/kbfiltr_false-unreach-call_true-valid-memsafety.i.cil.c` benchmark again (#290) and found out that it is still not memory safe at all. There is a bunch of places where...

issue with benchmark

This year several tasks with unsigned overflows have been added to some categories, e.g., in #234. In previous years, such tasks have been moved to the BitVectorsReach category and other...

issue with benchmark

Currently, we have this structure for SV-COMP 2017: https://sv-comp.sosy-lab.org/2017/categories.svg The main categories Arrays, BitVectors, and HeapDataStructures contain each a sub-category for memsafety or overflows, which in turn represent undefined behavior...

category definitions

Hi, In #4, #5, #6 I have provided patches for those benchmarks that I have submitted or feel somewhat responsible for. check-blacklist nevertheless still lists 3560 broken benchmarks, which ought...

``` cs_queue_true-unreach-call.i: In function ‘empty’: cs_queue_true-unreach-call.i:1048:2: warning: this ‘else’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] else ^~~~ cs_queue_true-unreach-call.i:1049:14: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is...

issue with benchmark

- How to generate the .i files automatically from the .c files? - How to remember architecture dependencies? - How to better reflect what the intentions of a verification tasks...

build system and metadata

Clang is emitting a lot of warnings of the same type for some very suspicious looking code in the `seq-mthread/pals_STARTPALS_ActiveStandby*.c` benchmarks. The warnings look similar to this: ``` pals_STARTPALS_ActiveStandby_false-unreach-call.4_1.ufo.BOUNDED-10.pals.c:320:22: warning:...

issue with benchmark

``` clang building /loops/veris.c_sendmail__tTflag_arr_one_loop_true-unreach-call.i veris.c_sendmail__tTflag_arr_one_loop_true-unreach-call.i:29:24: warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true [-Wtautological-compare] __VERIFIER_assert (i >= 0); ~ ^ ~ 1 warning generated. ```

issue with benchmark