somebody1234

if anyone wants to try, [this](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-shllink/16cb4ca1-9339-4d0c-a68d-bf1d6cc0f943) might be useful

@tape-guy doable but hacky and (probably) ugly imo - i'm still pretty sure the most appropriate/conventional way would be to create a `.lnk` file

Wildly varying errors (Ubuntu 16.10, Vivaldi 1.5.655.3 (Official Build) dev (64-bit) (uses Chromium 54.0.2840.89)) - worked fine the first time. Experimental WebAssembly, Experimental Validate Asm.js and convert to WebAssembly when...

Ah... makes sense I guess, but surely it'd be clearer to just write it as normal composition rather than `[map]`?

i feel like special literals would be better (like `%re`) so we could transpile to, say, `10000000000000n` nicely

@yawaramin it would also be possible to avoid having to allocate a string - not that there's a noticeable difference in perforamance very much of the time, but i do...

@yawaramin interned... sure. whether the runtime would optimize that into a bigint constant... i don't know. of course as i basically mentioned before, it'd also be more "idiomatic" - as...

might be of interest: i'm working on improvements to the DefinitelyTyped tests, and making examples valid TypeScript

it might also be worth noting that because of the nature of ramda (a lot of overloads, among other things), i really don't think converting ramda to typescript will offer...

note however, this means the examples must be working in both typescript and flow. meaning you would potentially need three sets of examples