somasun
somasun
@adamcalabrigo - are the failures for UCD90320 in P1 expected? If so, why?
Note: #461 is not a dependency until #471 . The platform service PRs dont rely on #461.
> that the failing test is due to the expectation of blue/amber leds to be present which are not supported on Darwin. Curious, aren't these tri-color leds? Is it possible...
Are you expecting to ship the units with all three possibilities - 4.1.2, 4.2.1, and 4.2.2? We want to carry versioned config only for what is actually needed.