Peter Solnica
Peter Solnica
I agree, this should be implemented here.
We already have features that are not available in plain Hash API and I don't think it was ever a requirement that Container must be replaceable by a plain Hash.
> Will it be possible to call validate inside rule block without providing an explicit key failure as shown above? @musaffa yes! I just updated the example but I think...
This needs a custom command. The built in behavior depends on sequel datasets that are supposed to return PK values and it looks like it doesn't do that when the...
@kwando thanks for testing it out @flash-gordon wdyt about adding a special command type for relations w/o an auto-incremental PK? it's not gonna be a common case but I'm sure...
@flash-gordon we can do that, although I'm not sure if I'm OK with extra code that is there just to handle something that is *rarely* the case :) What we...
This is super low priority. I moved it to 2.1.0 milestone
This is a useful feature. I already needed it in a couple of places.
I think this should just use command objects - is it not possible/feasible now? I do that easily in tests so...
@flash-gordon I'll try to reach out to the person from the reddit thread