Andrey Smirnov
Andrey Smirnov
@nickjanus it's not super-simple to implement, as it requires byte-by-byte compatibility in generated files so that signature would still apply. This is not what aptly was supposed to use for,...
@ealtintas the worst problem is that we need to generate byte-by-byte copies of package indexes, so that `Release` file checksums match with original. This implies that these index should be...
First of all, fixing my mistake, now @sliverc and @apachelogger are both owners of this organization, so they can manage members. If there are volunteers to take over the project,...
I will second everything @sliverc said above. Happy to host couple of video calls to hand over stuff and help to unblock things.
aptly 0.9 would have snapshot diff REST API, which returns JSON objects. I agree that having something parseable for the CLI mode would be great as well.
`aptly db cleanup` internally does full listing of files in the aptly pool trying to figure out if some package files are not used anymore.
Yes, there were many thoughts about that. Exporting state is not that complex, but importing is much more complicated.
So aptly state == DB + files in `pool` + published in `public/` (which could be recreated by re-publishing). DB could be exported more or less easily, it consists of...
@srvg there's already `Description` for snapshots, which is auto-generated right now. Would like to make them editable?
Ok, sounds good.