Andrey Smirnov
Andrey Smirnov
Sounds like a good improvement, I wonder if that can be default mode? Or should we better introduce yet another filesystem publishing method (symlink-relative)?
I think we can't convert existing published repositories from absolute to relative publishes easily...
aptly is supposed to be backwards compatible, so that upgrades should never be an issue. Conversion of existing published repos is not an easy thing to implement correctly, so I...
Something like Redis seems more appropriate, but the only requirement is to be able to satisfy this interface `Storage`: https://github.com/smira/aptly/blob/master/database/leveldb.go#L20
And package pool could be reimplemented on top of Amazon S3 or something like that :)
It won't help in your case. Data is stored as serialized BLOBs which would be hard to unserialize without aptly. It is much easier to add something that you need...
Sorry, it should be `aptly package show`
@sigmonsays package pool should be implemented on some external storage as well, e.g. S3. Once again it's a questions of building implementation that satisfies interface (internal package pool, `pool/` in...
@jschmidt3786 while publishing just override distribution name: ``` aptly publish snapshot -distribution="wheezy-security" .... ```
aptly 0.8 should automatically replace `/` with `-` in distribution name.