Steven Meisler

I'll close this issue, but I will note that the[ online readthedocs page for reconstruction ](https://qsiprep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reconstruction.html)does not have the PyAFQ information that is listed in the GitHub [docs/reconstruction.rst](https://github.com/PennLINC/qsiprep/blob/master/docs/reconstruction.rst).

For the first option, wouldn't the `rec-` label be more appropriate?

@mattcieslak I can send you HBN freesurfer data I have, would that work?

Hi, @PandaFaye, I think I see the issue (from this file https://github.com/PennLINC/qsiprep/blob/master/qsiprep/workflows/recon/anatomical.py#L132C1-L134C81): Lines 132-134: ``` workflow.connect([ (fs_source, outputnode, [ (field, field) for field in FS_FILES_TO_REGISTER])])

I have bids-ified one subject of the Natural Scenes Dataset, found here: (edit to remove link) I also have qsiprep outputs for it already, so you can go right to...

Don't mind at all!

You should sign the data access agreement, though: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSduTPeZo54uEMKD-ihXmRhx0hBDdLHNsVyeo_kCb8qbyAkXuQ/viewform

I don't see the new FA-alignment figure in the HTML unfortunately - happy to share any data that may help

It's one DWI series and a RPE fmap.

Looks like the bulk of correction is handled by TOPUP, but there is some movement in DRBUDDI ### TOPUP (lots of correction) ### DRBUDDI (not as much, but still noticeable)...