smaug----
smaug----
https://github.com/mfreed7/shadow-dom-selection?tab=readme-ov-file#changes-to-existing-selection-apis has the section for `Selection.getRangeAt()` and that behavior makes sense. Not sure about the "Mutability of live ranges returned from getRangeAt()" part. That is a bit vague. But what...
If selection does not react to the changes to range object(s), the API becomes rather weird. getRangetAt returning a mutable object, but after changes selection and the relevant range object...
The background here is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1511381
Why was the test removed from interop without agreement? We should add it back, since it follows the spec.
I'd prefer to add the test back, since it follows the specs. Pointer events (IIRC, but I might misremember and I don't have now a link to any discussion) on...
@zqianem
Blocklisting only currentScript name would help with this one particular case. But if sites let one to include unsanitized html, one could still override many other features on document, and...
Related to https://github.com/openui/open-ui/issues/1087#issuecomment-2381094286 The difference between the new select size=1 and the old select size=1 is that the new one has the popup living in the same process, so the...
I was told webkit has still async behavior here. @rniwa do you think webkit would be will to follow Gecko's and Blink's behavior here?
From the editing WG meeting minutes: "follow model of outermost wins." but that was for the first example. I agree that in the second one innermost should win.