smanna12
smanna12
> > I suppose intel_reqd_group_size will also be renamed? In a separate patch maybe? > > `intel_reqd_group_size` is not new to the optional device features design so the renaming should...
> Have you followed up to see if this suggestion works or not? (I'd slightly prefer the changes in one patch rather than a series of patches because they're all...
>>Personally, I am fine with this being merged into sycl while we are in the process of upstreaming it. This has been fairly well reviewed and there is immediate benefit...
@jchlanda, could you please add FE test?
Thank you @premanandrao for reviews!
@intel/llvm-gatekeepers , This PR is ready to merge. Thank you