sinoroc

> Isn't it this a bit of an edge-case[1](#user-content-fn-1-6e210a43a1118e82f6280dffb7771043) that we not necessarily need to optimise for? Based on my monitoring of StackOverflow, it does come up, not often but...

I guess in a first step we could place the credentials in the URL via pip's environment variables. Something of note, both pip and poetry seem to delegate to _keyring_,...

Maybe of interest: * https://discuss.python.org/t/adding-a-global-config-to-specify-package-indexes/8599

@matthewdeanmartin I can reproduce the issue. Thanks for filing it. I want to warn though that working on this project is quite far down in my priority list. Also this...

Thanks for the report. Yes, this was bound to happen. I want to point to this comment again: * https://github.com/sinoroc/tox-poetry-dev-dependencies/issues/45#issuecomment-712470400 I will look into it anyway and if the amount...

@johnthagen I guess it's also a good occasion to mention the other 2 plugin alternatives (I found so far) that I listed at the end of the _readme_. Maybe they...

It's a bit less straightforward than I initially expected... As far as I can see the _markers_ info is not in the _lockfile_. Looks like we might need to combine...

With `poetry

With the same `pyproject.toml`: * _Poetry version 1.0.10_: * I do see at least one _marker_ in `poetry.lock`. * _Poetry version 1.1.3_: * I do not see any _marker_ in...

@johnthagen This is an excerpt of `poetry.lock` generated by _Poetry version 1.0.10_: ``` [[package]] category = "main" description = "Python for Window Extensions" marker = "sys_platform == \"win32\"" name =...