Sina Habibian

@lrettig – happy to help, though will probably not have the capacity to be the primary driver. What are you thinking?

IMO we should implement this after we have the protocol described in written format, and have had a more rigorous discussion of it's security properties. Some quick q's off the...

Section 5.4 of the white paper has some relevant context on why the original protocol required the solver to post two solutions. Quoting below: """ **Forced error in disguise.** What...

• Does this function being `internal` as opposed to `private` cause issues? https://github.com/TrueBitFoundation/scrypt-interactive/pull/59/commits/dbe24c51bba8d785fd713d5b9b82a70017122793#diff-93850d9c4a6879f5d1697913e31c1501R34

• Refactor how the `runNextVerificationGame` is [triggered](https://github.com/TrueBitFoundation/scrypt-interactive/blob/master/contracts/ClaimManager.sol#L229). This currently costs the innocent caller a lot of gas.

More context on the attack: the attacker knows the total amount of deposits the altruistic verifiers have available. Therefore, it creates enough claims to bond all these deposits, and then...