simonrmaskell

If we get the implementation correct, we should find that IMM, GPB1, GPB2, GPB3 (an algorithm that people have thought of but rarely (if ever) implemented) and IMM2 (an algorithm...

Changing dimensions between models is an orthogonal design choice to the logic used to manage the hypotheses. My real point was that there is significant expertise in the team on...

@DaveKirkland I've prepared some slides previously and presented them to @paul-a-thomas, @sgmranso and @dcrew-dstl (Declan, not Duncan as mis-stated above (oops!)). I'd happily share those slides and/or present them again,...

If we want a common visualisation process that is agnostic to whether we use GOSPA or OSPA, I think there is still an issue here. Do we want the OSPA...

We (@simonrmaskell, @LeahPrice, @yifanzhou, @jswright-dstl) were talking about what we need to do in response to your kind work on integrating control variates into posterior. We have identified some functionality...

I think the "problem" is that if neither Posterior or the Stan software components take ownership of the specifics of the interface, users will make mistakes and won't use the...

Yes. We did talk about the idea of using a separate package. However, a separate package that uses control variates already exists (thanks to efforts by @LeahPrice). Given that, it's...

I think our view now (which I recognise may have evolved and may sensibly continue to do so) is that given the separate package can already calculate the control variates,...

Sorry to have been imprecise about "Stan itself", I meant that we currently plan to expose the control variates functionality via CmdStan with a view to CmdStanR and CmdStanPy then...

Looks like cmdstanr now has the functionality we need....