Simon P. Couch

Since this is functioning as documented and hasn't seen any recent activity, I'm going to go ahead and close.

Going to go ahead and close—feel free to holler if you'd like to revisit and we can reopen.

Yup, totally on board. Thanks for the issue. Will try to carve out time for this next time I'm focused on workflowsets!

I'm not focused on the package at the moment and will revisit once I sit down with the package for a day or two, but you're welcome to give the...

You'd not be duplicating effort (to my knowledge)! I'd say there is still interest here, and you're welcome to loop us in when you feel ready for testers and/or would...

Thanks for the issue and the kind words on stacks! You can use `predict()` or `augment()` on model stacks just like regular tidymodels workflows, then calculate metrics with yardstick functions:...

Apologies if I missed your intent there! Just to make sure I answer the right question: * Is the "final stack" the output of `add_candidates()`, `blend_predictions()`, or `fit_members()`? * Is...

Could you say a little bit more about why it is that you'd need to extract the splits from the `tune_results` rather than just reusing the splits you have already?...

Gotcha, thanks for the reply! I will leave this open as we can see some use cases for this, though it may not be at the top of our to-do...

Thanks for the issue! With the v4.0.0 release of LightGBM, the package will not need bundle methods—read more at https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/pull/4685#pullrequestreview-781313441 and linked PRs. Good idea on the butcher method, though!...