Simon Michael
Simon Michael
Repushed with `--balancing` option, a [test](https://github.com/simonmichael/hledger/pull/1479/commits/2256d25ee3ca5ccd50dd7a95e96fee77c55b9e05#diff-af74af066ad720e5d83bf6c4199c6541675e7efa4b51002765147f3d9ae8db8d) and [docs](https://github.com/simonmichael/hledger/pull/1479/commits/2256d25ee3ca5ccd50dd7a95e96fee77c55b9e05#diff-8615297534f2127f847dc7eab5866957d7fe7a9b73544b01d75acc383da2105f). I think it's ready for merge, any review welcome. "A surprising development in old behaviour: as a consequence of #931, print now...
Here's an entry that's hard to adjust for the new code (minimised from a cost basis adjustment transaction) : ``` commodity $0.00 2020-01-01 a A -11.0 @ $0.093735 b A...
(I think 1.)
Update: this is stalled, awaiting more testing and fixes for balancing precision issues.
Thanks for reviving this! `make help-buildtest` shows some make rules that may help show errors like the CI does.
Also, screenshots welcome when you get to that point!
Nifty. Is it in addition to/instead of the line chart ? examples/bcexample.hledger is a pretty good example journal.
> showing 2 pie charts when there are both positive and negative transactions might still be a good improvement, but I think this PR is ready to be reviewed even...
That sounds good. Will review as soon as I clear some PR backlog, thank you! Other reviewers welcome.
Also, I have seen it show two pies for one particular account, but most of the time it shows only one, or none. Perhaps there's a bug ? Eg with...