Simon Michael

@legrostdg I took a closer look. What's going on here is discussed at https://hledger.org/hledger.html#account-display-order -> "Note that sorting is done...". Here's a smaller example: ``` account a:x account b ```...

What about this one: ``` account a:y account b account a:x ``` Current output: ``` b a:y a:x ``` By your proposal it would be this, I think: ``` a:y...

There's room for confusion with all of these approaches, as you can see. I can rule out ever displaying `b` between `a:y` and `a:x`, if you try it I think...

Small comment on @legrostdg's original example at top: I don't know how that output happened. Here is the current correct output for that example (`2.a:2.e` and `2.a:3.f`'s sibling `2.a:1.c` is...

https://hledger.org/hledger.html#account-display-order says, in essence: > currently, the directive `account other:zoo` influences the position of `zoo` among its siblings, but not of `other` among its siblings It's worth reviewing whether we...

This area is delicate already, but patches welcome.

Cool, so --transpose and --layout=tidy are incompatible. We should give an error when they are combined, perhaps,

Ah, fair enough. So we should do nothing , and see if this trips up anyone else I guess.

Related to #1220 (comments in timeclock format). Let's keep this one open for timedot specifically.

Following up on djp's [timedot comment](https://github.com/simonmichael/hledger/issues/1220#issuecomment-968392952) there: - [timedot format](https://hledger.org/hledger.html#timedot-format) supports descriptions, written after the date - You can add a `; comment` and tags there too, but it's treated...