Simon Bos

#### What is the purpose of this change? Enabling a user to specify the interfaces used for DLNA (SSDP). This is especially useful when serving DLNA on a machine with...

See https://github.com/bufbuild/protovalidate/issues/101 for details. This depends on https://github.com/bufbuild/protovalidate/pull/114 being merged. However, locally I was able to build & run conformance tests using some edits to the `Makefile`. (After the merge...

Add timestamp.valid

1

See https://github.com/bufbuild/protovalidate/issues/101 for details. * protovalidate-go: https://github.com/bufbuild/protovalidate-go/pull/64 * protovalidate-python: https://github.com/bufbuild/protovalidate-python/pull/85 * protovalidate-java: https://github.com/bufbuild/protovalidate-java/pull/53 For protovalidate-cc, my C++ knowledge is quite rusty so I'll need some help there.

[Feature Request] Support specification validation for google.protobuf.Timestamp

4

**Feature description:** The well-known `google.protobuf.Timestamp` specification imposes some constraints on the fields ([see source](https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/main/src/google/protobuf/timestamp.proto)): ``` message Timestamp { // Represents seconds of UTC time since Unix epoch // 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z. Must...

Add timestamp.valid evaluator

1

See https://github.com/bufbuild/protovalidate/issues/101 for details. This depends on https://github.com/bufbuild/protovalidate/pull/114 being merged. However, locally I was able to build & run conformance tests using some go.work and buf.work.yaml trickery. (After the merge...

See https://github.com/bufbuild/protovalidate/issues/101 for details. This depends on https://github.com/bufbuild/protovalidate/pull/114 being merged. However, locally I was able to build & run conformance tests using some edits to the `build.gradle.kts` and `Makefile`. (After...