Simon Dew

That's an elegant solution and meets the use case perfectly.

> But what we could do is allow the author to itemize which callout numbers the author sees in the image I think I prefer this approach. Perhaps as well...

See #625 for PR on prod

Thanks for this @sarahlwelton ! I'll be able take a look at this PR after the end of October, if no-one else looks at it first.

Thanks @ggray-cb . I think the ideas and changes in this PR have been implemented by more recent PRs in later versions. Closing this one.

What's the problem that this solves? Is it to enforce consistent terminology? 🤔 Because if that's the case, it seems to me, you then have the problem of enforcing the...

> More recently we're trying to name e.g. "App Service" or "Application Service" or "Backend-as-a-Service" and thought it would be convenient to tokenize these so they can all be changed...

> Maybe use AsciiDoc's built-in custom inline markup with a term role This might quickly become unworkable if you have a lot of terms in a page.

This PR is not for merge!