simar7
simar7
hi @Hacks4Snacks - thanks for the PR! I've been trying to understand the changes you've made by improving the predicate logic. While the logic makes sense to me, wouldn't this...
@DmitriyLewen could you take a look?
@marcofranssen - I'm a little bit concerned why the tests are failing. Also since this will be a breaking change, I'd like to understand more clearly why no user has...
At this time we don't make any guarantees in the trivy operator open source which would cleanup any caches. It's up to the user to do so.
> The ignorefile argument accepts multiple files and then merges them into one, @nikpivkin if this is the case, then we shouldn't do this as it diverges from Trivy CLI...
At the moment we don't support this but if you have an idea on how we can implement this, we would love to take a look at your PR.
@Nemric what metrics are you talking about? https://aquasecurity.github.io/trivy-operator/latest/tutorials/integrations/metrics/ these?
> > [@Nemric](https://github.com/Nemric) what metrics are you talking about? https://aquasecurity.github.io/trivy-operator/latest/tutorials/integrations/metrics/ these? > > Yes, there are some metrics but not all, for example, the one in the example : `trivy_image_vulnerabilities`...
hi @frankonr - thanks we'll take a look - it might be a regression.
> I created a PR for this here: [aquasecurity/trivy-checks#436](https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy-checks/pull/436) @tijmenvandenbrink is this related to this issue?