silverpill
silverpill
Yes, but on this image `in_reply_to_id` is also null, so it is probably not a reply?
I haven't found this field in Mastodon responses, but Pleroma includes `pleroma.in_reply_to_account_acct` and I added it too. @watamelonman said that fixed the problem, so we can close the issue now....
Yeah, I think it was fixed. Nobody complained about the bug since then.
It would be nice to include NodeBB and Discourse communities too. The number of projects compatible with Lemmy is increasing
I think "transient activities" should be removed from the spec. It sounds like "looking up" is the only purpose of an identifier, but identifiers can also used for authentication, authorization,...
ActivityPub emoji reactions: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/c0e0/fep-c0e0.md
Core types mentioned many times throughout the ActivityPub spec. Quick analysis: - "actor", 124 occurrences - "activity": 84 occurrences - "collection": 106 occurrences Literally everything hinges on their definitions.
>Are the listed types really subtypes/subclasses of a "core type" or "core class"? @TallTed Yes, they are. ActivityPub spec talks about the relationship to ActivityStreams in section [3. Objects](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/#obj): >Objects...
The definition of "core type" matters because according to AS2 there is a hierarchy of types: >Every JSON object in an Activity Streams 2.0 document is either an Object or...
>I don't think the spec implies this and I also don't think whether Actor is a "core type" or not has any bearing on this. @nightpool If AS2 type hierarchy...