Sihyun Jeon

hey interesting finding. just based on quick scanning, maybe this part https://github.com/mg5amcnlo/mg5amcnlo/blob/LTS/models/check_param_card.py#L572-L575 is not working as expected? For the first lines that we are dropping, at least in madgraph internal...

> For which you clearly see that it is supposed to be always producing syntax. So somewhere this `/weight>` is getting dropped and making `/>` which i don't understand... >...

hmmm @DickyChant were you able to find other buggy cases? i am wondering if the bug always affects the same weight block `ctz_0p_cpt_0p_cpqm_0p_cpq3_0p_ctw_1p_ctp_1p_ctg_0p_nlo` in this twz sample

Did you actually check if this is working? there is top quark interfering the process and did not work when b was massless, for me

that's weird... in any case even if it worked, How do you deal with tzq overlap? `add process p p > w+ z j [QCD] @1` for example if j...

can you also share your gridpack? curious how it worked in your case anyways

i agree to what yihui says, although I don't think there is more diagrams that's going to be generated by doing it in the proc_card I am not sure, so...

@menglu21 what is the "current syntax" you are referring to? it was previously 5fs for both p and j, now it's only for j. former or latter?

@DickyChant ah makes sense. though your modelling seems wrong @jennetd i checked your gridpack and you keep your 4fs definition in your run card ` 4 = maxjetflavor` while you...

If you want 5FS (b included in p), you need `maxjetflavor=5` (hence your gridpack you had previously is wrongly set and i presume this was why your gridpack was wrongly...