Kenneth Siewers Møller

Are there any plans on merging this?

I can see this is still open, so I just wanted to know if this is something that will be available at some point :) In version 6, the `Satisfy`...

I now understand why this is a difficult problem to solve. If the order is undetermined, it's impossible to present a correct assertion error to the user. Given 5 inspectors...

Unfortunately, using `[CallerArgumentExpression]` doesn't work with params or collections, since I need access to the individual inspectors. It could work if I created a bunch of overloads, e.g.: ```cs SatisfyInAnyOrder(Action...

Windows 11 will not be reported through User-Agent strings. You will need to switch to using User-Agent Client Hints as described here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/web-platform/how-to-detect-win11 Basically, you need to send some response...

@jnyrup I'm sorry, I didn't find that specific issue when I searched, but it does look similar to what I'm proposing here.

@dennisdoomen I'm a bit unsure how to proceed. I don't have an overview of the FluentAssertions architecture and design. I might simply start by "brute-forcing" the idea in and take...

I've looked into it and I must admit it doesn't seem possible to do what I'm asking. Because I need the `Should()`extension to be generic, I think this would be...

The closest thing I've been able to get is where I explicitly make the `Satisfy` method generic, similar to `Match`, so it would look something like this: ```cs SomeType subject...

In that case, I believe an additional overload to `Match` that accepts an element inspector would be a better solution. It would also make sense to reuse the existing terminology...