Kenneth Siewers Møller

Hi ;) This would actually be quite useful since `System.Text.Json` doesn't support anything like that at the moment :)

I am looking at this right now, and having to know that the order is important, is a bit unfortunate. The `Respectively` word isn't really clear to me that it...

I know what it means, but only after looking it up ;) I just believe it would have been a lot easier for non-native English speakers to understand if it...

The issue, as described, is still very relevant. I would propose adding `SatisfyInOrder` as an alternative solution and marking the `SatisfyRespectively` obsolete. Would that make it a non-breaking change in...

I'm sorry, I just looked in the v6 branch. I wasn't aware that it is implemented already, so you're right, I think it will do exactly what I expect 👍...

In my case I'm using an AmplifyHD router, where I cannot disable the DHCP server unless I put it in bridge mode, effectively making it a glorified switch with a...

Sorry about that, I mistyped the return type. I've updated the sample. It is in fact the `BlobContainerClient` that is returned, which doesn't seem to have changed in a long...

I should probably also remind you that I can perfectly fine substitute the `BlobContainerClient` class and invoke methods on that substitute. It's only when the `BlobContainerClient` is used as a...

But if I can write `Substitute.for()` which works, but a substituted interface with a method that returns the same type fails. I find it a bit strange that the addition...

Okay, I get it. That makes sense. It's of course not possible for you to know or detect these kinds of changes, but could it be possible to maybe add...