shuki-zanyovka

> ok to test Hi @yosefe , Can anyone review this PR? Regards and thanks, Shuki

> It is my third time that I'm asking you to remove ChangeID. Fixed.

> > @rleon Our initial intention was making efa_setup_qp() more robust as its current implementation has internal calculations that, although very unlikely, can be tackled by external (seemingly valid) inputs....

> > > > @rleon Our initial intention was making efa_setup_qp() more robust as its current implementation has internal calculations that, although very unlikely, can be tackled by external (seemingly...

> @mrgolin @shuki-zanyovka can you please summarize what you're trying to fix here? You started with a custom provider that bypasses qp limits check and it got more and more...

> max_rq_wr Does it mean we need to compare it to: roundup_pow_of_two(cap->max_recv_sge * cap->max_recv_wr) ? I.e. max_recv_descs = roundup_pow_of_two(attr->cap.max_recv_sge * attr->cap.max_recv_wr); if (max_recv_descs > ctx->max_rq_wr) { verbs_err(&ctx->ibvctx, "Max receive WR...

> > > max_rq_wr > > > > > > Does it mean we need to compare it to: roundup_pow_of_two(cap->max_recv_sge * cap->max_recv_wr) ? > > I.e. > > max_recv_descs =...

> > > > > max_rq_wr > > > > > > > > > > > > Does it mean we need to compare it to: roundup_pow_of_two(cap->max_recv_sge * cap->max_recv_wr)...