Supernovae

> yes that's interesting, thanks for the info, I am facing difficulties in fetching orientation for accurate transforms, any ideas for that?

Hi @bigsuperZZZX why is `/others_odom` being published from `swarm_bridge` and `traj2odom_node` I believe the odom published by `traj2odom_node` node is generated from received traj based on time allocations and the...

> to reduce communication burden I understand, but the o/p of `traj2odom_node` is useful for drone_detect only right?

What's the difference between [HIGHRES_IMU](https://mavlink.io/en/messages/common.html#HIGHRES_IMU) [SCALED_IMU](https://mavlink.io/en/messages/common.html#SCALED_IMU) [RAW_IMU](https://mavlink.io/en/messages/common.html#RAW_IMU)

> @shubham-shahh there are some subtle differences: `SCALED IMU` the values are converted to other units and rounded to uint16_t, so they are not as accurate as `HIGHRES_IMU`, but use...

> I don't know if I understand your comment correctly. So there is no additional special care taken to transmit the messages within one mavlink frame. So the functionality I...

> I also encountered the same problems, thus I proted it to noetic + gazebo 11. You can find the repo [here](https://github.com/NovoG93/sjtu-drone) Okay thanks, I'll look into it

any update on this issue? I have noticed it on os0 32 channels as well, running latest driver.

> I did some more testing today, and though the flickering and lost data is a lot less, I can still see it at 1024x10. > > Is this an...

> Here it is at 1024x10. It is better, but there is still a small flicker occasionally. [Screencast from 04-01-2024 09:06:42 PM.webm](https://github.com/ouster-lidar/ouster-ros/assets/15201656/3c7d0d07-7e1e-4aa1-b6e4-1fb8fe3aca22) what's the platform on which you're testing this?...