Shriram Krishnamurthi
Shriram Krishnamurthi
This *could* be related to #1422?
Worse: even AFTER the tests pass, the REPL is unusable, giving the "Key" error!
Removing the `Key` definition entirely makes all these problems go away. Note that I'm in *untyped* CPO.
I don't understand this response. It says the LEFT side was not a defined convenience constructor. There is no convenience constructor on the left side.
That's not very clear at all!
To be clear, @blerner and I have somewhat different takes on what macros for Pyret might even look like. Ben would prefer that they be constrained to a particular syntactic...
Pyret isn't just a syntax; it's an ecosystem. We have a large number of users, materials, etc. written around it. There is nothing special about Pyret's syntax. In fact, it...
At this point Pyret's syntax is pretty set, though it is conceivable that if there are small changes we can make that would enable, say, clean macro systems, while still...
We've already implemented "Racketty" numbers three times (WeScheme, Whalesong, Pyret). Perhaps you should consider reusing existing work…