Stephen Hicks

Do you see a reasonable way to support both? What do you propose to fix this?

Within google, it seems that only 10% or so of the calls pass the noreferrer option, less than 100 total. Unfortunately, it's unlikely that any tests would break if we...

@ddworken Can you give some more details about this? I don't fully grok what's going on here. When did the behavior change? Can you point to when/where the spec changed...

IIUC, @ddworken is saying that absolutizing the URL is insufficient because Firefox won't trigger the redirect at all in the first place. Otherwise, it sounds like `innerHTML` (aside: would `appendChild`...

We had a realtime chat about this and came up with the following plan: * Ignore `no-referrer` in modern browsers that _support_ COOP (since we can't detect specifically whether it's...

Neither is particularly relevant. The developers.google.com documentation was written by someone outside our team years ago and we don't own it. The github.io documentation was supposed to be a version...

Wow, thanks for pointing that out. That's a pretty glaring inconsistency. In my opinion, Range is in the wrong, and in an ideal world we would change it to be...

Guava has been quite successful with named factories for ranges: `Range.closed(1, 3)`, `Range.closedOpen(2, 4)`, `Range.lessThan(5)`, `Range.atLeast(6)`, etc. Simply accepting an inclusive and exclusive parameter and allowing either order seems like...

Also, in terms of trying to insert a semantic distinction between "point" and "value", I'm not at all keen on that option. It's not something that's at all obvious without...

@dankurka Can you take a look at this?