Neil Henning
Neil Henning
@DBJDBJ thanks for the brain dump, but I've got to say whether you intended it or not it did indeed come across as patronizing. Information == good, drama == bad.
I think I'd rather add `utf8ccmp` (codepoint compare?) - since we've already got `n` as a denotion for bytes as a relic from mimicing `string.h`. Thoughts?
Should be doable - but I don't have the bandwidth at present to do this.
I think the fails are because you should use`UTEST_NULL` instead of `NULL`.
Gurgh - Windows is complaining with: ``` warning C4130: '==' : logical operation on address of string constant ``` I think if you added that warning to `UTEST_SURPRESS_WARNING_BEGIN` here https://github.com/sheredom/utest.h/blob/master/utest.h#L506...
Oh actually, can you add tests, since they'd need to fail. Lemme think on that bit!
Closing in favour of #110
I did think about CC0 - but it likewise hasn't be tried in a court to prove it works. I have a personal distaste for dual licensing just because it...
This is the problem with dual licensing in general tbh - no-one can agree on what is best. In reality the 'safest' dual license is Apache 2.0 for the patent...
I don't have that setup alas - but I'd happily accept a PR if you can fix it!