shellfly
shellfly
No method for this now, The `all` method get a queryset of all votes by a user, you can use the code in this method and remove the user argument....
It's an interesting feature. There is a [`calculate_vote_score`](https://github.com/shellfly/django-vote/blob/master/vote/models.py#L70) method on the VoteModel. If you overwrite this function on your model, you can get a custom score for every vote action....
First question, currently we don't support string user id, if you really want string user id, you have to fork and change the field type. Second, you have to run...
@YemreGurses In the beginning, this project doesn't support down vote, so one's vote record either exists with a `created_at` or been deleted. Since version 2.1.4 which down vote was supported,...
There is a `UP` and `DOWN` constant in vote.models that you can import and use instead of using the number 0 or 1 directly. the down action was supported after...
You can use the [`annotate`](https://github.com/shellfly/django-vote/blob/master/vote/managers.py#L166-L179) method, pass in a query set and the current user id, it will return a new query set with `is_voted_up` and `is_voted_down` property set on...
The `down` feature was added later, the document doesn't mention there is a new `action` parameter for both [`exists`](https://github.com/shellfly/django-vote/blob/master/vote/managers.py#L140) and the [`user_ids`](https://github.com/shellfly/django-vote/blob/master/vote/managers.py#L161) function, you can use the second parameter to...
That will be great, any contribution is welcome
@edegeyer The changes break backward compatibility and also introduce duplicate code. I would like to do it like this: ``` def count_up(self): return self.count(self, UP) def count_down(self): return self.count(self, DOWN)...
@edegeyer There are two fields[ `num_vote_up` and `num_vote_down`](https://github.com/shellfly/django-vote/blob/f628a49c5e1e2ac2a91ac87922936e71d9b48523/vote/models.py#L58-L59) added when implementing down vote. They can be used to replace the `count` api now. If you're willing to update the PR...