shea-hawkins

@DoodleBobBuffPants -- we're looking to begin using this. Other than the new merge conflicts, what do you think it will take to get this approved?

@dcsobral now that coursier/coursier#1541 is solved, do you know what we need to do for this?

@dcsobral I see. I can make the ticket for it; do you know the parameter in particular we're trying to pass?

Or wait, it looks like ticket was referenced in coursier/sbt-coursier#257, which should "Take into account UpdateConfiguration passed to DependencyResolution".. maybe DepResolution update works now?

Ah, I see, it's lazy implementation of only the missing fields. I'll see if I can get retrieveManaged in. Maybe the philosophy is to port as few parameters as they...

Same here. Works in some places but this is pretty broken.

@brian-brazil The problem is that you're assuming com.sun is part of the JDK running the code, which isn't guaranteed. To fix this, it can be included as a transitive dependency....

@brian-brazil this may be a case where you strictly need them. The only dependency on central that I can find for this library is this unofficial one: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.sun.net.httpserver/http/20070405