David Peter
David Peter
Thank you for the report. It's been a while since I worked on this code base, to be honest. I think there is no way to do this, but I...
I'm sorry, but this is not something I can contribute to in a meaningful way.
Thank you. Did you do any benchmarks to see what the performance impact of this is? You can find examples of how we benchmark hexyl in other PRs (search for...
Note: there is also https://github.com/sharkdp/hexyl/pull/213
I'd rather not pull in external dependencies / scripts just for building binaries. But if someone wants to add that target in CICD.yml, please go ahead.
In hyperfine, we have an option for parameterized benchmarks which is sort of a more general version of this. Just as another idea: ``` -L, --parameter-list Perform benchmark runs for...
If `diskus` sees "{}" as a literal argument, then something is wrong with your command.
https://docs.rs/num-rational/latest/num_rational/struct.Ratio.html
https://docs.rs/bigdecimal/0.3.0/bigdecimal/ => any way we can do trigonometry with this?
A feasible option might be to use f64 for floating point and num_bigint/num_rational for integers, rationals.