Shargon
Shargon
> We need to update the abi with a transaction. I think we need another solution. Please check this version
Yes, i think exactly the same as you @EdgeDLT
It should be reconfigured on View=0 :S
The problem could be solved with https://github.com/neo-project/neo/pull/2444 . Isn't it?
> Which is weaker than validators script, even though committee has a lot of power. It could be a problem for mainnet, but I think that it's not a problem...
It's good but this will be inside the json format (as script), or you have plans for other format?
`PUSHINT16 [0x02,0x55]` it's the same as `PUSHINT16 0x0255` ? The asm format that you define seems good, but it is not clear to me how you want to integrate it...
`ExecuteTo:"abcd"` i like it, "abcd" it's a label, right?
What do you think about something like this: ``` { PUSH 1//push 1 number PUSH 2 CALL method1 RET; } method1: { label1： [Assert:CurrentContext.EvaluationStack.Count=1] [Assert:CurrentContext.EvaluationStack[0]={Integer:123}] ADD 88: RET } ```
Is expected, we index more information, and is stored there