shamoon

Again, I appreciate the load-testing but is this a realistic problem? I could see improvement with incremental loading but if that only becomes an issue at absurd numbers of correspondents...

Yea agree about the massive environment list, this version also uses the extends feature which [as I mentioned in the other PR](https://github.com/paperless-ngx/paperless-ngx/pull/2660#pullrequestreview-1294759720) I am a little concerned will confuse folks...

Of them all I think #2661 is the least "intrusive", it allows portainer users to use it very easily but keeps the portainer files separate and has the least amount...

Would like to circle back to this and see if we can agree on a solution as these three PRs seem to be languishing here.

@sbrunner Thank you for all of the effort. We talked about this a bit and as a group weren't quite convinced that the pros outweigh the cons with these changes....

Content matching is definitely on the list, though Im not sure if I'll include it here just yet. Templates (what will now become "consumption triggers" cant use that since the...

> I was thinking about implementing manual application of a template. but seeing this, I probably should wait for this PR? Then we could manually trigger a workflow for a...

Thanks stumpy, I like the diagram idea, fancy:

Ok! I've gone ahead and added content matching 🎉, again this is an option that can only used for Added / Updated. It obviously uses the existing matching logic, only...

Thanks stumpy! I'll work on the rest of these soon, yes let me know if you see anything else.