shahafn
shahafn
Is there an update on this issue?
Created issue AA-434
@dancoombs Hey Dan we removed the erc from this repo, can you please add it to https://github.com/eth-infinitism/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4337.md
Please explain this issue, since from first glance it doesn't look like an issue but the intended behavior
The paymaster is supposed to be charged the postop gas limit, the gas used before, and the EntryPoint overhead. Given that, do you see an issue?
Thank you for letting us know! @drortirosh We should probably deploy 0.8 on Celo as well
Hi @peersky This suggestion makes the contracts too generic, with an increased gas cost and bloated code, since instead of using the generated dispatcher by solc to determine the function...
Maybe I misunderstand something: for instance, you replaced `validateUserOp()` with `beforeCall()`. How would the wallet know what `beforeCall()` should do? Do you intend 4337 wallets to implement erc 7746 only...
> > Maybe I misunderstand something: for instance, you replaced `validateUserOp()` with `beforeCall()`. How would the wallet know what `beforeCall()` should do? Do you intend 4337 wallets to implement erc...