shadowgate15

@evenstensberg What do you mean by "include"?

I'll probably work on it at some point but it might be a bit before I circle around to it.

We need to fix the tests to use `beforeEach` and `afterEach` to make sure the app is started on a random port and closes the app after the test. This...

And assign it to me I'll fix it later on this week.

In order for it to offload it would probably make since for bree to create a dedicated worker that could then accept a message containing the path to the job...

Not directly in the configs. however you could listen for the `'worker deleted'` event and then set a timeout for that job to run again. If you would like to...

Yes @meglio! Thank you for catching my mistake! 😅

Use `bree.update` instead

No updates. However, I have been thinking on this. One of the core pieces of `bree` is that it is designed to be a job scheduler not a manger. Hence,...

@mpmartins the backend handling the state of the job is the way Bree is designed and is how it remains state management agnostic. This is also how I for see...