Sean Gilligan

I noticed a similar issue when putting together an offline install of this package. I've also noticed the version of `requests` is very specific (June 2020 version and onwards), and...

Thanks for having a look @Secrus . The issue I have is Google OSS-Fuzz won't let me see the details about their fuzzer for tomlkit that I contributed too, without...

Hey @abebeos , I only ever got as far as adding the ValueError exception and a unit test for it. I'm not going to be finishing this change so feel...

Thanks, setting that variable gives an initial improvement `2 -> 15 functions covered`. Then I updated how croniter was imported into the fuzzers which gave an additional improvement `15 ->...

That's correct yes. It's not turning up in the Functions coverage either.

Thanks for the quick fix. Did a bit of local testing with the latest fuzz-introspector repo and results look good. ``` import function_inspector function_inspector.print_function_details( "cachetools", [ "cachetools.cached.decorator", "cachetools.Cache.__init__", "cachetools.LFUCache.__init__", ],...

Hey @DavidKorczynski , some observations from the latest introspector report for cachetools [https://storage.googleapis.com/oss-fuzz-introspector/cachetools/inspector-report/20230501/fuzz_report.html](https://storage.googleapis.com/oss-fuzz-introspector/cachetools/inspector-report/20230501/fuzz_report.html) . The calltree looks good, and `__init__` methods are showing as covered. And the overall coverage number...