sftcd
sftcd
So I've taken a look at splitting the PR into 3: server, client and extras (in that order, each building on the earlier) and while I fear it'll feel a...
> `Makefile:3686: build_sw` got an error code 2 in the m68k-linux-gnu workflow, you might wanna check upon this little detail. > > _EDIT: `Makefile:30897: test/ssl_old_test` has an error code of...
> @sftcd given you've already a working implementation and that an interop test would be if not mandatory then very much welcome, I'd say doing what Hugo suggests would definitely...
On 05/05/2024 13:56, mishase wrote: > @sftcd @t8m is there any updates on this PR? It needs review from openssl team members. I understand that that's challenging given the size...
> Not a detailed review. Fair points all:-) I'll do a rebase of the PR and fix those next few days. Question though: would it help to try point at...
> That would be helpful but reviewers will still need to look at everything... Of course (and apologies again for "everything" being so much;-) If you or someone had some...
I made the above changes to a rebased dev branch that I've pushed to github - will push to this branch in a bit. (Late here now.)
Huh, I seem to have accidentally closed the PR when pushing to it.... will fix and reopen when I figure out how:-)
I think I undid that bad push so hopefully the PR is now up to date with those changes from yesterday and rebased..
On 29/11/2022 13:26, Matt Caswell wrote: > @mattcaswell approved this pull request. I had a look at those changes and they all seem fine to me too fwiw. Also -...