Andreas Sewe
Andreas Sewe
> I can't read the bug report as it seems not public visible... I assume you mean that nexus mess up the xml. Yes, seems to be a security precaution...
> @sewe did you find a workaround for this? @i386 No, I don’t have a workaround, except from the wholesale [exclusion of problematic dependencies](http://www.mojohaus.org/animal-sniffer/animal-sniffer-maven-plugin/check-mojo.html#excludeDependencies). > @olamy do you know the...
> And which version does work? Version 2.0.1, the version the example mentioned uses originally, works (after setting `%_tmppath` in `~/.rpmmacros`, which seems to be an unrelated OS-X-specific problem).
> just want to confirm %_tmppath must be set under ~/.rpmmaros so that the provided example works with rpm-m-p 2.0.1. However, the does not work with 2.0.1+? Yes, under Mac...
> sounds like RPM version compatibility. Will you be able to reproduce it under Linux? Just tried it under CentOS 6.7 (my target system) with the bundled rpmbuild: ``` >...
No, I am using [MacPorts](https://www.macports.org/) rather than Homebrow ``` sudo port install rpm ``` and ``` sudo port install rpm54 ``` See [here](https://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=name&substr=rpm) for the versions of `rpm` (includes `rpmbuild`)...
I also prefer Hamcrest's style (`assertThat(result, isSuccessful());`, but `assertThat(result).isSuccessful();` is the way AssertJ works and that cannot be changed. That being said, as of issue https://github.com/khmarbaise/maven-it-extension/issues/6, the assertions have moved...
Question: Will this be toolchain-enabled? Would be nice to be able to specify something like `requires` `vendor = openjdk` and `version = 11`, matching the toolchain’s `` `` and ``...
One thing that is IMHO important is that the WALA “framework” does not itself try to `close()` a `Module` itself when it thinks it is done with it. Instead, it...
> If `WhenAnotherFileAdded.testGetFiles` is explicitly selected as the only thing to execute, then `WhenFileRemovedAgain.setUp` should not be invoked. @sbrannen Thanks for the quick reply. In that scenario, `WhenFileRemovedAgain.setUp` is indeed...