Seth Friedman

@chuckx 👋🏻 Wanted to follow up on this. This didn't land by the end of April timeline from our last discussion. Is there a new target date for Apple Silicon...

Hi @chuckx, following up on this

Hi @chuckx, are we still on track for end of June for the 1.7.0 release?

It would be great too as part of this work if Tink could be vended as an xcframework instead of a framework. xcframeworks are Apple's format for distributing binary frameworks,...

Hi @kste @thaidn, any update on this? Our entire team of 80 engineers just got M1 machines, and our app won't build correctly until Tink supports Apple Silicon without extensive...

@thaidn Thanks! @juergw Will this also include distribution as an xcframework via CocoaPods as well?

Hi @juergw @thaidn, want to follow up on this. Any update on the "very soon" fix and whether it will include xcframework distribution via CocoaPods? :)

Thanks for the quick reply @juergw! > Sorry for the delay. I have a fix, but it is not yet synced with github Is there an ETA on when it...

Thanks @juergw! I'm not able to test this on iOS because Obj-C source builds are broken: https://github.com/google/tink/issues/529 I opened an issue for XCFramework support here: https://github.com/google/tink/issues/583

@pvparuchuri The solution we're using is pretty iOS specific, but it's outlined in this blog post from Bogo Giertler: https://bogo.wtf/arm64-to-sim.html