Ramon
Ramon
@adriancole I don't really understand what you're suggesting. Do you mean that we somehow signal upwards to "restart" request processing just because we want to add a tag? Also: we...
I think we should add the value of the Host header. Even if this ends up being the hostname of the serving instance (and so not very useful) it is...
I am confused why high cardinality is such a big concern. Why is low cardinality important? Is this due to a limitation/feature of some backends? I am also not suggesting...
That sounds useful. Is it possible to configure those aggregations to not use the Span name? As mentioned before, even with just the path we are already talking unbounded cardinality...
Oh, I'm not suggesting we *remove* the path or even the method. I think we should have path, method *and* host header in the span name by default. Then allow...
@adriancole that's not my intention at all. I want span names to be more descriptive. I believe that in most cases, adding the Host header will make them more descriptive...
@rakyll what's your position on host header in span name?
So I think it comes down to whether we want the default span name to be guaranteed low cardinality. If this is the case, I am on board with @yurishkuro...
If we have a good story for rate-limiting (per #9) then we should turn it on by default IMO. Otherwise it's opening yourself up to a DoS unless you have...
I don't think it's too late to have this as an opt-in option. For Go, I would suggest we add a formatter function to the exporter something like: ```go e...