Sergey Simonchik

@jan-molak Thank you for filing this! These features are missing in current protractor+cucumber+IntelliJ integration. Would be great to add them. >Top-level steps executed (Given/When/Then), so that the test execution tree...

>I think a mechanism used to report on Serenity/JS tasks could be similar to the one used to report on Cucumber's Given/When/Then steps, but I guess the tricky thing would...

>I used a regular mocha test runner to demonstrate the concept Thanks, the issue has been reproduced for me when running mocha tests (https://github.com/mochajs/mocha/issues/2684). Yes, seems to be not related...

Hey Jan! >Does the below structure still reflect what you'd like to receive (you as in "IntelliJ/WebStorm" ;-) )? No, it doesn't. Unfortunately, this structure doesn't allow to navigate from...

@jan-molak Sorry, missed the question. >What information does IntelliJ require to do the navigation? Currently, WebStorm (2017.1.1 as of now) doesn't support any provided navigation details. We need to settle...

Sure, that would work fine. As for reporting the results at a scenario level rather than a step level, you're right, I missed that. However, it might be convenient to...

@jan-molak Maybe `sourceLocation.name` doesn't sound great as location doesn't have name. Maybe let's just have: ``` { "category": "Discount codes for selected products", "name": "Using a discount code received from...

@SimenB What do you think?

Another benefit is that it would be possible to attach captured messages sent to `console.log` to correct tree test nodes. Now messages sent to `dump` or `console.log` are attached to...

Yes, it's still needed. I'll try to find time to work on this.