Security Generation

Results 18 comments of Security Generation

Came here looking for this exact functionality. Looking forward to it, any ETA? Let me know if you need help testing :)

That's indeed some epic work. Well done @khorben! Now if only the world could finally move to IPv6 ;)

Very much looking forward to this too.

Would be nice to see this one merged :)

At a glance (as a security person), this proposal doesn't sound unreasonable for the most part. The highest sensitivity is arguably the hardware ID/serial number, but the way you hash...

I agree, this is a good idea, and I like the backward compatibility. Do you have some instructions about how to put the preferences in the right place?

It would be cool to be able to push the config for GCS Auth via MDM profiles, like how it possible for S3: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1046239/101642498-5fcdd480-3a33-11eb-9eda-ef968287b4c5.png)

@waderobson do you have a recommendation for how to set these preferences via MDM (e.g. profile)? For testing I tries setting these parameters locally using: `defaults write ManagedInstalls GCSClientEmail -string...

> I briefly tested this with a custom profile and using a payload content with something like this: > > ``` > PayloadContent > > > PayloadDisplayName > Munki Settings...

Just wanted to follow up on this one. Any guidance on the mobileconfig would be appreciated!