Sergey G. Brester

> My PHP skript runs "fail2ban-client status haproxy" to get a list of blocked ip-adresses to process it further. Would probably not solve the issue, but `fail2ban-client get banned` is...

@yarikoptic I can make a IPv6 version as described in your plan, but: - I will make it iptables/debian only, need help from another contributers for other systems; - unfortunately...

Short - no, we have not. But I work on the solution, unfortunately fewer as secondary priority (there much to do). @fail2ban/developers any thoughts?

We have introduced a new branch with IPv6 support: 0.10, and the new PR #1410 The decision is at least firstly - 0.9 will never get IPv6-support. Everyone interested to...

Thx, I will take a look into your library... > I would also like to have IPv6 support in fail2ban Well, we have it in 0.10 (even pre-released and yet...

@basd82 It is already implemented in 0.10.x (ca. one and a half years).

> As this issues is open. - [ ] subnet - [ ] all banning actions must provide IPv6 capability

@f0o this is very easy: we've a conditional section that allows to differentiate between IP families. For example take a look into any action supporting IPv6, e. g. https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/blob/b5dd5adb08f9fd3496f8c63b1d53b0e3c6aabbf1/config/action.d/iptables-common.conf#L79 Short...

There is no reason to remove it, is there one? Think about boxes they never get an update for 3.6... The change would be justified if support of 3.6 should...

> recent Ubuntu version which no longer provides Python 3.6. And the reason to switch to recent Ubuntu version is? (I know at some point it'd be necessary but...) >...