Sebastian Huber

Maybe you have a look at Boost.Intrusive: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_64_0/doc/html/intrusive.html Does it really make sense to simply wrap a lock around the container? Normally, you have the containers with additional state which...

The xilinx-microblaze/lock-dualprocnoos.c and altera-nios2/lock-dualprocnoos.c seem to be copy and paste versions of this. They are also broken. At which level should the target_lock() ensure mutual exclusion? How is this related...

I don't use the FreeBSD kernel directly. I use a port of FreeBSD kernel code to RTEMS. I got an error on powerpc. The problem is when you don't add...

Is there a general issue with this patch? From my point of view it fixes an obvious issue for all targets with small-data area.

getifaddrs() is supported by libbsd.

> @sebhub so it fails because of some bdbuf stuff missing in the configure test case and not because `getifaddrs()` is missing. Any idea what could have happened here? Try...

It seems your RTEMS version is not new enough to provide a -lrtemsdefaultconfig. Who calls the main() function in your Autoconf tests?

Yes, and who calls this main function?

I would provide a stub code so that all link-time tests by the configure script pass or fail as you want. Alternatively, you could copy a hard coded configuration header...

I had a look into the default configuration and using -lrtemsdefaultconfig will likely not fix this issue. You need a configuration which enables a use of getifaddrs() called by a...