Harald Heckmann comments

Results 68 comments of


                                            Harald Heckmann

Implement Global Disputes

We should also add the information that this pallet was added to *docs/changelog_for_devs.md*, like it was done for the Styx pallet. Ideally we name (or put a reference to) all...

[simple-disputes] Ramp up the bonds for simple disputes

We should discuss the implications of that. Chris is currently implementing the global disputes, which are the ultimate judgement. Ramping up the bonds should happen within boundaries that still allow...

Increase system scalability by improving internal_resolve and admin_destroy_market

We have discussed this option once and came to the conclusion that this is viable, but it is coupled with an enormous ongoing effort to maintain the orml fork. This...

Increase system scalability by improving internal_resolve and admin_destroy_market

This issue is resolved. Resolution complexity is bounded now and does not depend on accounts. Future tasks that resulted from the PR #806 are creating a garbage collection for worthless...

Unusual behaviour on liquidityMining.ownedValues

Reducing to high priority because liquidity mining is currently disabled until all bugs are resolved.

Cache account ids?

Absolutely. Let's keep it a low priority for now because it is an optimizations that is not needed right now, but eventually will be.

[authorized] Allow origins as authorized entity in `authorized`

For now we will use proxies to allow groups or other entities to decide the final outcome. However, sometime in the future this is a great feature. In that case,...

Why does `ReportingPeriod` have type `u32` instead of `BlockNumber`?

Maybe for convenience when coding, not sure about that. It should be `BlockNumber`.

[Swaps] getSpotPrices RPC for Scalar markets does not work as expected

We'll investigate. @yornaath

[PM] Add the ability to flag invalid markets

I think it would be nice to reward those who flag markets correctly and risk reducing their ZTG bond. Maybe we can use part of the `ValidityBond` to reward those...