S Panfilov

I see you points, cause indeed it makes code review a bit polluted, but let me think a bit about that, cause I have some concerns

@wilgert Can you clarify what exactly you are suggesting? Cause the guy in the article first created branches for each release (which is okeish), but then switched to unpkg (which...

@wilgert Well, don't get me wrong - that's sounds reasonable. But that means we have to setup publish process somewhere on CI/GH Actions or whatever. That's the thing to do....

@lhtdesignde Hi, firt of all thank you for using jsvat. Hm, I'm not sure about this one, honestly... The thing is that I wanted to drop support of everything below...

As a temporary [solution](https://github.com/se-panfilov/jsvat/pull/81), `commonjs` is now (v2.1.4) target es5, it might helps

Hi @titarenkoeleonora , Not right away I'd say. I work on this lib on my free time anyway. If you want to speed up the process, you could create a...

Well, honestly I already do it in one click in WebStorm. I think that it's a kind of extra to have a lot of npm tasks in `package.json` such as...

Also I'd like to mention that existed tests are not really unit tests - they are functional tests, which test how the lib works against certain list of VAT in...

Also, you can run tests from you cli like this: ```shell jest --testNamePattern=^Andorra ```

Well, in short - yes, but not very soon. In other hand - if you will create a PR which provides that support - I'll add it to the lib