Ville Skyttä

#1702 requires a rebase after this is in, will take care of it.

The only one I happened to hit with my normal usage patterns, yes. I didn't analyze beyond that.

Yep, seems to work nicely, thanks! An observation is that as the `completion` command is hidden, no completions are generated for its arguments (i.e. "foo completion Tab"), but that's such...

Sure, no rush at all as far as I'm concerned, take all the time you like :+1:

Reworked and still untested, hopefully I didn't add too many bugs.

Rebased.

Looks like this breaks some tests. Not sure if those indicate bugs in respective tests, as the failing ones get called with the main command name in their args as...

Oh, please go ahead if you have the time, I don't know when I'll find time to look into this closer again, but it'd be great to see this in!

I've done a mechanical rebase of this and #1392 on top of current master. Haven't had a closer look at what @marckhouzam proposed in comments above. If you have the...

Sorry about the delay in following up. I agree with the concerns flagged by @marckhouzam, and made an alternative implementation in #1450 that doesn't have those problems. It's not that...