Scott Chamberlain
Scott Chamberlain
okay, makes sense
thanks, will take a look
Sounds good to me. Maybe we'll find a better solution in the future, and/or maybe NCBI will fix it
hmm, the way i've seen it done and I've done it as well in some pkgs, is to have two fxns, one like `foo` and another `foo_` - where `foo()`...
the two parameter option sounds good
> this might cause a problem when one genus names is used for multiple genera. does this mean many genera in different higher taxonomic groups? e.g., the same genus name...
possible to allow user to give a higher taxon group ?
> If there was a variant on `taxize::classification` that returned the taxonomy of all matches, perhaps with an additional column of numbers to specify which match each rank belonged to...
Which thing would work?
Thanks for clarification. Sounds good up to the point of rbinding together - that would mean a departure from the output format in other cases - and I'd rather not...