Christopher Schütte

Hm, I will have a look. Are you sure about the type ReMap tries to set using the set-method mentioned in the stacktrace? You said > [...] remap internally creates...

Yeah I thought about something like this, too. Since the JavaDoc for Collection class says something like "every collection should provide a default constructor" we're not that hacky as I...

Cool! Okay you're right, the exception handling might be a little too unspecific. But the solution might come up with changing the way of instantiation. As far as i know...

Thx. I'm on it.

Can you please send the mapping configuration or a reproducing, minimal example? I'm able to reproduce an exception, but it's not the one you mentioned.

I created a PR to reproduce the problem. See #145, is this what you did in your mapping config?

Thank for your idea. Can you give me a short example of what you want to do? Just to get the use-case right. My first guess would be, that the...

Ah okay, so if your idea is to relax the validation of set-methods to support chained setters I would welcome a PR :) Sounds very reasonable to support this.

Hi, very cool that you managed to do it! That does not look that complicated. Good idea! I would like to integrate your PR. I would check backwards compatibility with...

Ah! One more thing. ReMap has an API for testing. Can you verify with a test, that the Assert API works well with your extension?