Stephen D
Stephen D
@Turbo87 I'm using this: http://www.aprs.org/doc/APRS101.PDF Messages start on page 71/81.
Are there any plans to merge this? I know it needs the conflicts resolved, which I'm happy to fix. Just wondering if I should fork this instead
Looks like I need to update the README to add the symbol table/symbol code chars
Looks like I need to update the README to add the new flag
@chubin I am familiar with wttr.in and will emulate its output. The README states: > If you want to install the rate.sx server, you can do it. Keep in mind...
@Benjamin-L Huge props for the extremely thorough code review! I believe all requests have been addressed if you want to review it again.
No worries! Just glad it got merged.
Here's roughly what I was thinking: The `Tnc` struct would have 2 additional methods - one to accept a connection, and one to attempt a connection. `accept_connection` would return a...
I thought about it some more, and the `Tnc` struct should hold a `Vec`. I think this is needed so that the `Tnc` struct knows how to delegate received messages...
Personally, I still feel that option 3 is the most elegant. To me, it seems like option 2 and option 3 are similar - option 2 just holds a bunch...